Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #37619
      Charith
      Participant

      Hi Steve,

      I also have a knowledge gap when calling direct inguinal hernias. I’m confused when there is just significant bulging of fat just superior to the inguinal canal rather than just popping up like a mushroom medially to the IEA (when I easily call these direct inguinal hernias) What should I call these as these look almost like a direct hernia as its in the similar location, or are these sportsman hernias /groin or posterior wall insufficiency?

      Im not sure if this makes sense.

      Your thoughts will be greatly appreciated.

    • #37620
      Stephen Bird
      Keymaster

      What a wonderful question,

      Yes, this is a common area of debate and you will meet people with different opinions.

      My opinion is what you described as fat bulging anteriorly just superior to the inguinal canal but not entering the canal should be called posterior wall laxity.
      If it is a young athlete I am happy to call it a sportmans hernia but only in a young athlete with athletic pubalgia symptoms.

      If the fat goes through the posterior wall of the canal and enters the canal , expanding the canal and passing towards the superficial ring I call this a direct hernia.

      My view is to only use the word “hernia” when a fascial plane has been broken and material passes through it. If it is not broken, but just weak I use the word laxity .

      For example if the linea alba is very weak and bulges forwards when a person tries to sit up I call this linea alba laxity and rectus sheath divarication. If there is a hole in the linea alba and fat is passing from the peritoneal space into the subcutaneous space I call this a ventral hernia.

      This is my logic.

      Steve

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Stay in Touch

Sending

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?